Good corporate governance means a company operates transparently, ethically, and responsibly. However, not all corporations consistently uphold these standards, and when governance failures lead to harm, affected individuals are increasingly turning to group litigation to seek justice. In this ‘group litigation corporate governance’ guide, we’ll dive into how lawsuits have shaped business ethics and accountability, explore notable case studies, and highlight the potential for these actions to bring about positive change across entire industries.
What is corporate governance?
Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled. It’s more than just a set of rules; it sets the tone for how a company operates, influencing everything from financial reporting to environmental impact and consumer protection.
| Good corporate governance | Bad corporate governance |
What it looks like | Good corporate governance means decisions are made responsibly, risks are managed, and ethical practices are prioritised.
| Bad corporate governance often leads to unethical decision-making, lack of transparency, and increased risk of mismanagement.
|
In practice | Companies with robust governance communicate openly, treat stakeholders fairly, and are transparent in their operations. They comply with regulations, make ethical choices, and create value for shareholders and society alike. | Companies with poor governance may cut corners, hide financial information, or ignore regulatory requirements. This can result in legal issues, public backlash, and a damaged reputation.
|
Potential consequences | When companies uphold strong governance, they build trust, foster loyalty, and create long-term value, contributing positively to their industry and the broader community. | When governance fails, the ripple effects can be devastating – leading to lawsuits, regulatory scrutiny, and a serious hit to public trust. Poor governance erodes confidence and can even result in financial collapse, harming employees, investors, and consumers. |
How group litigation promotes accountability in corporate governance
When individuals unite to take collective legal action, they not only seek justice for themselves, but also compel corporations to address governance issues that potentially impact consumers, employees, and society at large. So, group litigation forces companies to confront unethical or illegal practices that may otherwise go unchallenged.
Here are four ways group litigation promotes accountability in corporate governance:
1. Exposing corporate misbehaviour
Short term benefits
Group litigation doesn’t just seek compensation – it shines a spotlight on issues companies might prefer to keep in the dark. This includes things like:
- Data breaches
- Environmental violations
- Misleading product claims.
As these cases unfold, they attract media coverage and public attention, bringing corporate misconduct to the forefront and igniting public conversations about corporate responsibility.
Long term benefits
The exposure from group litigation has lasting effects, pressuring companies to:
- Reassess governance structures and policies in areas like compliance, risk management, and consumer protection.
- Build stronger defences against future issues to protect their reputations.
By holding companies publicly accountable, group litigation also compels other businesses to make significant, lasting improvements to maintain trust and avoid future scrutiny.
2. Incentivising transparency
Short term benefits
Group litigation often forces companies to disclose information about their practices, products, and operations. This immediate transparency helps businesses demonstrate accountability, showing stakeholders (from customers to regulators) that issues are being addressed responsibly and proactively.
Long term benefits
Over time, transparency becomes a standard in corporate governance, leading to:
- Improved communication with stakeholders.
- Stronger internal checks and balances to address issues before they escalate.
Companies that prioritise transparency are better able to withstand public and regulatory scrutiny, and this culture of openness helps them avoid future litigation and build a reputation for integrity.
3. Encouraging adherence to regulations
Short term benefits
Collective claims often put pressure on companies to improve their compliance programmes. For example, cases involving data privacy breaches or financial mis-selling may highlight gaps in regulatory adherence. This scrutiny places both the company and the broader industry on notice, signalling that efforts must be stepped up to meet consumer and legal expectations.
Long term benefits
By drawing attention to regulatory failures, group litigation motivates companies to strengthen governance practices to:
- Prevent future lawsuits or regulatory action.
- Meet consumers’ ethical expectations.
- Build a more resilient, trusted brand.
4. Driving internal reforms
Short term benefits
Group litigation can prompt immediate governance changes within a company, often leading to:
- Adding oversight committees.
- Revamping compliance programmes.
- Implementing new ethics guidelines.
These changes aim to reassure stakeholders and mitigate reputational damage in the wake of litigation.
Long term benefits
Beyond short-term fixes, companies facing group litigation often make lasting internal reforms to mitigate future risks. This leads to:
- A more robust governance structure that adapts to evolving ethical standards.
- Higher industry standards, as other businesses adopt similar policies and strengthen controls to avoid similar challenges.
Ultimately, the drive for internal reform raises the bar for corporate governance across industries.
Examples of corporate governance changes driven by group litigation
Several high-profile cases have demonstrated how group litigation can lead to enduring changes in corporate governance. These case studies highlight the significant impact of collective actions.
Volkswagen’s ‘dieselgate’ scandal
The Volkswagen emissions scandal, also known as dieselgate, is one of the most well-known examples of group litigation impacting corporate governance. In 2015, it was revealed that Volkswagen had installed software in diesel vehicles to cheat emissions tests, causing these cars to emit harmful pollutants far above legal limits. Consumers around the world joined group litigation efforts to seek compensation, holding Volkswagen – and eventually other car manufacturers – accountable for misleading marketing, environmental harm, and financial losses.
Group litigation corporate governance impact
In response to the scandal, Volkswagen overhauled its corporate governance structure. The company enhanced its compliance and risk management programmes, with a particular focus on emissions standards and environmental responsibility. Volkswagen also implemented stricter oversight and audit measures to prevent similar issues in the future.
Beyond Volkswagen, the dieselgate scandal set a precedent across the automotive industry – not just for those manufacturers caught up in group litigation – leading to more rigorous testing protocols and stricter emissions standards.
BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill
In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill became one of the largest environmental disasters in history. The spill resulted in extensive environmental damage and affected thousands of livelihoods. In response, impacted communities, businesses, and individuals joined group litigation to seek compensation and hold BP accountable.
Group litigation corporate governance impact
The Deepwater Horizon litigation revealed significant shortcomings in BP’s safety practices and risk management. Following the spill and the ensuing legal battles, BP made substantial changes to its corporate governance. It introduced stricter environmental safety protocols, created an independent safety and operational risk team, and placed a renewed focus on environmental and safety compliance. The disaster and subsequent litigation also influenced other energy companies to follow suit with more robust safety and environmental standards.
Facebook’s data privacy violations
In 2018, Facebook faced intense scrutiny after it was revealed that data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica had harvested data from millions of Facebook users without their consent. This led to group litigation in multiple countries, with consumers seeking accountability for Facebook’s failure to protect their privacy.
Group litigation corporate governance impact
The Facebook data privacy scandal led to significant changes in the company’s corporate governance, particularly in its approach to data protection and transparency. Facebook implemented new privacy controls, enhanced user data protection policies, and committed to greater transparency in how user data is collected and used. The company also established an oversight board to ensure its policies align with ethical standards.
This case set a broader precedent, as tech companies across the globe began to strengthen their data governance structures to avoid similar legal and reputational risks.
Wells Fargo’s account fraud scandal
In 2016, it was discovered that Wells Fargo employees were creating millions of fake bank accounts without customer knowledge to meet sales targets. This scandal sparked a series of group litigation cases in the US.
Group litigation corporate governance impact
The fallout from the scandal prompted Wells Fargo to make sweeping changes to its corporate governance structure. The company eliminated aggressive sales targets that had incentivised unethical behaviour, revamped its board of directors, and established an independent risk management unit to oversee compliance. In total, the bank invested $50 million to improve oversight in its branches.
The ripple effect on industry standards
As companies see the consequences of weak governance in high-profile cases, they are more likely to proactively adopt stronger governance standards to avoid similar issues. So, while group litigation primarily impacts the specific company involved, the effects often extend across entire industries.
Here’s how group litigation influences industry standards over time:
Raising the bar for corporate governance
When a company is held accountable through group litigation, it sets a powerful example.
- High-profile cases draw significant public and regulatory attention, creating industry-wide pressure to adopt higher standards.
- Competitors often respond proactively to demonstrate a commitment to responsible practices, and gain a competitive advantage.
- Over time, these changes raise the bar for corporate governance, creating a more ethical business environment.
Influencing regulatory changes
When group litigation cases expose gaps in regulatory oversight, they provide a clear case for updating laws and guidelines, helping industries stay in line with evolving ethical and social expectations.
For example, the Facebook data privacy scandal contributed to heightened regulatory scrutiny and the development of stricter data protection laws, such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Promoting a culture of accountability
When companies face legal challenges for unethical practices, it serves as a wake-up call – not just for those companies, but for their competitors as well. Over time, industries start to see accountability as essential, not optional.
Eventually, companies realise that focusing on accountability isn’t just about avoiding lawsuits or penalties. By being transparent, managing risks responsibly, and prioritising ethical practices, they build deeper trust with stakeholders and the wider public. This trust becomes a valuable asset, enhancing the company’s reputation, attracting loyal customers, and creating a stronger, more resilient business overall.
Protecting consumers and public interest
One of the most significant benefits of the ripple effect is improved protection for consumers. As industries raise their governance standards, consumers enjoy safer products, stronger data privacy protections, and more ethical business practices.
Driving corporate change through group litigation
From game-changing settlements to sweeping industry impacts, group litigation drives corporate reform, setting ethical governance as the new norm. Ready to hold companies accountable and push for real change?
Explore the UK’s top group litigation claims with Join the Claim – your voice matters.
